ABSTRACT
Objective: Disorders characterized by "distressing unexplained somatic symptoms" are challenging. In the ICD-11 Primary Health Care (PHC) Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Mental Disorders (ICD-11 PHC), a new category, bodily stress syndrome (BSS), was included to diagnose patients presenting unexplained somatic symptoms. The present study investigated the association of BSS with anxiety, depression, and four subgroups of physical symptoms in a Brazilian primary health care (PHC) sample. Methodology: As part of the international ICD-11 PHC study, 338 patients were evaluated by their primary care physicians, followed by testing with Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, Version 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). BSS was diagnosed in the presence of at least three somatic symptoms associated with incapacity. The association between anxiety, depression, and four subgroups of physical symptoms with being a BSS case was analyzed. Results: The number of somatic symptoms was high in the overall sample of 338 patients (mean = 8.4), but even higher in the 131 BSS patients (10.2; p < 0.001). Most BSS patients (57.3%) had at least three symptoms from two, three, or four subgroups, and these were associated with anxiety and depression in 80.9% of these patients. The symptom subgroup most strongly associated with "being a BSS" case was the non-specific group (OR = 6.51; 95%CI 1.65-24.34), followed by musculoskeletal (OR = 2,31; 95%CI 1.19-4.72). Conclusion: Somatic symptoms were frequent in a sample of PHC patients in Brazil. In the present sample, one third were BSS cases and met the criteria for at least two symptom subgroups, supporting the hypothesis that different functional symptoms are related to each other.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , International Classification of Diseases , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/classification , Primary Health Care , Somatoform Disorders/classification , Syndrome , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/classification , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to identify the association between emotional distress and social support networks with quality of life in primary care patients. This was a cross-sectional study involving 1,466 patients in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2009/2010. The General Health Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument were used. The Social Support Network Index classified patients with the highest and lowest index as socially integrated or isolated. A bivariate analysis and four multiple linear regressions were conducted for each quality of life outcome. The means scores for the physical, psychological, social relations, and environment domains were, respectively, 64.7; 64.2; 68.5 and 49.1. In the multivariate analysis, the psychological domain was negatively associated with isolation, whereas the social relations and environment domains were positively associated with integration. Integration and isolation proved to be important factors for those in emotional distress as they minimize or maximize negative effects on quality of life.
O estudo teve como objetivo identificar a associação entre sofrimento emocional e redes de apoio social com qualidade de vida em pacientes de atenção primária. O estudo transversal incluiu 1.466 pacientes nas cidades de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, entre 2009 e 2010. Foram utilizados o General Health Questionnaire, a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale e a versão breve do World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument. O Índice de Redes Sociais de Apoio classificou os pacientes com as pontuações mais altas e baixas como sendo socialmente integrados ou isolados, respectivamente. Para cada resultado de qualidade vida, foram realizadas uma análise bivariada e quatro regressões lineares múltiplas. As médias para os domínios físico, psicológico, social e ambiental foram, respectivamente: 64,7; 64,2; 68,5 e 49,1. Na análise multivariada, o domínio psicológico mostrou associação negativa com o isolamento, enquanto os domínios social e ambiental foram associados positivamente com a integração. A integração e o isolamento apareceram como fatores importantes para aqueles com sofrimento emocional, já que minimizam ou maximizam os efeitos negativos sobre qualidade de vida.
El estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar la asociación entre sufrimiento emocional y redes de apoyo social con la calidad de vida en pacientes de atención primaria. El estudio transversal incluyó a 1.466 pacientes en las ciudades de São Paulo y Río de Janeiro, Brasil, entre 2009 y 2010. Se utilizaron el General Health Questionnaire, la Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale y la versión breve del World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument. El Índice de Redes Sociales de Apoyo clasificó a los pacientes con las puntuaciones más altas y bajas como estando socialmente integrados o aislados, respectivamente. Para cada resultado de calidad vida, se realizó un análisis bivariado y cuatro regresiones lineales múltiples. Las medias para los dominios físico, psicológico, social y ambiental fueron, respectivamente: 64,7; 64,2; 68,5 y 49,1. En el análisis multivariado, el dominio psicológico mostró una asociación negativa con el aislamiento, mientras los dominios social y ambiental se asociaron positivamente con la integración. La integración y el aislamiento aparecieron como factores importantes para aquellos con sufrimiento emocional, ya que minimizan o maximizan los efectos negativos sobre la calidad de vida.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Primary Health Care , Quality of Life , Social Support , Mental Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Mental health problems are common in primary health care, particularly anxiety and depression. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of common mental disorders and their associations with socio-demographic characteristics in primary care in Brazil (Family Health Strategy). It involved a multicenter cross-sectional study with patients from Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Fortaleza (Ceará State) and Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul State), assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD). The rate of mental disorders in patients from Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Fortaleza and Porto Alegre were found to be, respectively, 51.9%, 53.3%, 64.3% and 57.7% with significant differences between Porto Alegre and Fortaleza compared to Rio de Janeiro after adjusting for confounders. Prevalence proportions of mental problems were especially common for females, the unemployed, those with less education and those with lower incomes. In the context of the Brazilian government's moves towards developing primary health care and reorganizing mental health policies it is relevant to consider common mental disorders as a priority alongside other chronic health conditions.
Problemas de saúde mental são comuns na atenção primária e são geralmente relacionados à ansiedade e à depressão. Este estudo tem o objetivo de avaliar a taxa de transtornos mentais comuns e suas associações com características sociodemográficas em unidades de saúde da família. É um estudo multicêntrico, transversal, com os usuários da atenção primária do Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Fortaleza (Ceará) e Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul), Brasil. Utilizou-se o General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) e o Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD). A taxa de transtornos mentais nos usuários do Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Fortaleza e Porto Alegre foram, respectivamente, 51,9%, 53,3%, 64,3% e 57,7%, com diferenças significativas entre Porto Alegre e Fortaleza comparando-se ao Rio de Janeiro. Problemas de saúde mental foram especialmente altos em mulheres, desempregados, em pessoas com baixa escolaridade e com baixa renda. Dadas as iniciativas do governo brasileiro para o desenvolvimento os cuidados primários e para reorganização da política pública de saúde mental, é importante considerar os transtornos mentais comuns como uma prioridade tal como outras morbidades crônicas.
Los problemas de salud mental son comunes en la atención primaria y están relacionados con la ansiedad y la depresión. Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las tasas de trastornos mentales comunes y sus asociaciones con las características sociodemográficas de los usuarios de la atención primaria. Se trata de un estudio multicéntrico, transversal, con usuarios de Río de Janeiro, São Paulo, Fortaleza y Porto Alegre, Brasil. Se utilizó el General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) y el Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD). La tasa de trastornos mentales en pacientes de Río de Janeiro, São Paulo, Fortaleza (Ceará) y Porto Alegre (Río Grande do Sul) fueron, respectivamente, 51,9%, 53,3%, 64,3% y 57,7%, con diferencias significativas entre Porto Alegre y Fortaleza. Los problemas de salud mental fueron especialmente altos en las mujeres, desempleados, personas con bajo nivel educativo y quienes tienen bajos ingresos. Teniendo en cuenta los esfuerzos del gobierno brasileño para el desarrollo de la atención primaria y las políticas para la reorganización de la salud mental es importante considerar los trastornos mentales como una prioridad junto a otras afecciones crónicas.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Geographic Mapping , Prevalence , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Objective: To identify the associations among quality of life (QoL), social determinants and psychological distress in primary care in two cities in Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 1,466 patients from 2009 to 2010. The statistical analysis used the t-test to compare the variables of interest to the study. Results: The prevalence of Common Mental Disorders (CMD3), severe forms of Common Mental Disorders (CMD5), anxiety and depression were 20.5%, 32%, 37% and 25.1% respectively. Thes presence of psychological distress is associated with worse QoL among the patients studied, especially those older than 40 years of age. In cases of CMD3, those with higher income and educational levels presented higher QoL in the psychical and psychological domains. For the cases of probable anxiety, those with higher educational levels presented lower scores on the physical and social relationship scores. Conclusion: Psychological distress can be associated with a worse QoL among those studied and can be influenced by socioeconomic conditions. Therefore, it is important to structure patient-centered help, which should also include patients’ social contexts. .
Objetivo: Identificar as associações entre qualidade de vida (QV), determinantes sociais e sofrimento psíquico na Atenção Primária (AP) em dois municípios do Brasil. Métodos: Estudo transversal com 1.466 pacientes atendidos na AP de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro nos anos de 2009 e 2010. Resultados: As prevalências de Transtorno Mental Comum (TMC-3), Transtorno Mental Comum de intensidade grave (TMC-5), casos sugestivos de ansiedade e de depressão foram de 20,5%, 32%, 37% e 25,1%, respectivamente. Observou-se a associação entre as variáveis socioeconômicas e a presença de sofrimento psíquico, em especial para aqueles com idade superior a 40 anos. Nos casos de TMC-3, aqueles com maior renda e nível educacional apresentaram maiores escores nos domínios físico e psicológico. Para os casos sugestivos de ansiedade, maior nível educacional apresentou menores escores nos domínios físico e relações sociais. Conclusão: Entre os pesquisados, o sofrimento psíquico associou-se a menores escores de qualidade de vida, podendo ser influenciado pelas condições socioeconômicas. Dessa forma, é importante estruturar uma assistência centrada no paciente, que também deve incluir o contexto social dos pacientes. .